Forum discussions Who's online Member Birthdays

Post a reply

Write your message and submit
Tip: To insert a drawing, type the Drawing ID between the [drawing]123[/drawing] tag.
The drawing ID is the number at the end of your drawing URL.
E.g. ratemydrawings.com/drawings/cartoons/123.html
:) :| :( :D :o ;) :/ :P :lol: :mad: :rolleyes: :cool:

By posting you agree to our Behavior Policy.
Options

< Back to previous page

Topic review (newest first)

cocofrog
03 Jul, 2012 11:31 am

I know tons of professional artist who use ref for the line art, the proportions because one line out of place will mess the whole drawing up. They omit to tracing....Who cares art is art...doesn't matter how it was created.

and even if you use a ref pic like my star wars one, it still is not the same as the ref no matter how good the artist is.

I have noticed my original art gets lower rates than the ones i use ref for...

and some one posted how would you feel if some one stole your art...well not stilling art I am learning from them, the reason you post the ref is show your appreciation. 

most of my ref anyways are from movie scenes or celebrities so didn't steal nothing.

Please people don't worry about rates draw to have fun, or draw to tune up your skills.

When you start worrying what rates you get or whether or not your going to make people mad you used a ref...you'll get no where on rmd.

I love art it lets you escape from the world around you. You can be anyone or be anywhere.

melldoodle
02 Jul, 2012 9:39 pm

Nicely spoken, LNear.

I don't think it matters how someone draws something, if it looks good then it looks good. It depends on the artist how the end result looks like, even if you do use a reference.

Some people use references to study anatomy to getting better with their originals, there's nothing wrong with that. Even if some people do hate fanart, it's their problem, not ours. People that draw fanart draw what they like, they don't have to care about what other people think of their drawing. If they like it, then just let them be.

I think it's pretty immature how some people are against references, everyone starts somewhere, you can't expect someone to be pro and never having used a reference before in their life, that's abnormal.

Besides that, a lot of people that are against fanart/references do use it themselfs, which is also pretty hypocrite, don't you think?

Ahh, I could go on and on about this topic, but my post is already pretty long, so, this is where I stop ranting.

LNear
02 Jul, 2012 12:55 pm

I learned by using refs. Seriously, I don't even think it is half fair that when I used a ref I got more rates than using my screwed up imagination.

Also, In my opinion, some people use refs because they like the picture, to get better at drawing different things (( we have to copy art in school ))

If you don't like fan art then just don't click the drawing :u

rain162
02 Jul, 2012 12:14 pm

Polly Esther wrote:

Something that must also be accounted for is that there are different ways to use a reference.  Not everyone "copies" a reference.  some use a reference(photographic) and completely transform the image to their style, or use several references and combine them into something new.  The old realists and impressionists used the landscape around them.  What exactly is different when using a photograph?  The old masters had their apprentices copy their work.  Many old masterpieces have been revealed to be the work of an apprentice, and not the master.  It is how we learn, and there is nothing wrong with it.  Using references is valid.  If you have a style as an artist, it is going to show itself regardless of whether or not you use a reference, or how closely you try to follow and copy.  I cannot think of any "style" of art that has not had resistance to it being considered "art".  As for fan art, have you ever seen the credits on a cartoon?  Do you really think there is only one artist at Disney studios who draws for a feature length film?  Nothing wrong with fan art.  I would hope that people vote based on what they see, without preconceived ideas.

Right on :D

Polly Esther
20 Jun, 2012 5:05 pm

Something that must also be accounted for is that there are different ways to use a reference.  Not everyone "copies" a reference.  some use a reference(photographic) and completely transform the image to their style, or use several references and combine them into something new.  The old realists and impressionists used the landscape around them.  What exactly is different when using a photograph?  The old masters had their apprentices copy their work.  Many old masterpieces have been revealed to be the work of an apprentice, and not the master.  It is how we learn, and there is nothing wrong with it.  Using references is valid.  If you have a style as an artist, it is going to show itself regardless of whether or not you use a reference, or how closely you try to follow and copy.  I cannot think of any "style" of art that has not had resistance to it being considered "art".  As for fan art, have you ever seen the credits on a cartoon?  Do you really think there is only one artist at Disney studios who draws for a feature length film?  Nothing wrong with fan art.  I would hope that people vote based on what they see, without preconceived ideas.

jyu viole grace
20 Jun, 2012 12:56 pm

Whether you drew with a reference or not is NOT really important. What people rate, or maybe it's just me, is the quality of your work. Not because you used a ref, doesn't automatically mean you gave less effort on your drawing. Although an original art has the uppeehand since they not only showcase their talent in drawing but as well as their creativity, It does take talent to succesfully redraw another's work. I find it difficult to redraw my own work how much more to draw another person's.
But Im against plagiarism so do acknowledge the person who drew your ref. drawing if you plan on doing so.

Purple Webbing
20 Jun, 2012 12:03 pm

4ever_Broken wrote:

I am being completely honest in saying that I hate fanart. Using refs for realism I get, becuause it is practice with shading, etc. especially when it is an original photograph.

But fanart? Fanart is a direct copy of something created by someone else. [<<<red*rouge mentioned this]

If you change the pose, okay, but um... hello?

The definition of ART- "Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way to affect the senses or emotions. It encompasses a diverse range of human activities, creations, and modes of expression, including music, literature, film, sculpture, and paintings. ..."

~Artists have been striving to go by the definition of art, and stridently go against it. Just look at Dada artist Duchamp, art shouldn't be defined, therefore you shouldn't be one to criticize someone's catalysts for becoming a better artist.
   I like fan art for it just shows an artist's interest in a subject and enjoyment at attempting to re-create that. When people have a grand idea and need a reference to convey that, I don't see a fault there either.

ambrosia_angel
19 Mar, 2012 3:25 pm

mellmonster wrote:

besides that, people are still free to not post references, even if you want them to post it, they won't.

There's really nothing you can do about it, you'll have to deal with it. Rather you like it or not.

Also, there are artists on here that drawing "Original" and are actually using references, which is pretty lower than not posting a reference to a fanart drawing. In my opinion that is.

I find this comments really sad sad
Personally I think its really bad that you wouldn't ref a drawing. Just because other people do it and we "can't stop it" doesn't mean you should continue to do it. I thought people on RMD were better than that.

It's not like I'm saying fan art is bad because I think its good :3 I just dislike your out look on this subject.

Other than that, not using a ref is still bad whether a person has put it in the original or fan art catagory.

Anyway back on topic - I think it's about the quality on art. Usually the thumbnail creates my first impressions which contributes to my rating score.
People need to realise that its about the quality of art and not other little things like references and the artists!!
This is my view non-manga art. I rarely rate manga nowadays.

Candicott
19 Mar, 2012 2:22 pm

I remember back when I was like 12 or 13 (I'm 16 now... don't go on too often as I used too) on this site no one ever talked about the use of refs haha, well I don't really mind the use of refs, what really matters to me is the quality and effort put into the drawing to make a good drawing. It's not like its super easy to use a ref, it takes time and effort, personally I don't use refs too often, only two drawings in my gallery (out of 11) has used a ref. tongue And if I use a ref it's because I like the picture/drawing, and honestly it really helps you improve (manga specifically for most, realism kinda requires refs) I don't know just kinda wanna to express my opinion on the case. i hope im not bashed for my opinion >.<

END RANT. XD

buhrd
19 Mar, 2012 1:43 pm

red*rogue wrote:

AND what buhrd said

what
what did I say

red*rogue
19 Mar, 2012 12:58 pm

@Mellmonster

I don't feel like quoting on a quote on a quote on an etc. (quoteception >_>? Too confusing to give it a term.)

To deal with it?

Not really. I think I'm the first who says that mentioning that you used a ref would be respectful to an artist.
Now that I mentioned it, there's a chance other people agree (:.

And come on, people.

8 characters (out of 250) are too much to waste on mentioning that you used a reference? ("Ref used"). There's no excuse for that :'D. If you have a lot to say, internet slang the rest of your drawingdescription.

Oh gawd, what kind of important information will go lost if you didn't have those EIGHT CHARACTERS. It'll be a catastrophe! *trolololo*

And seriously (not offensive) I don't care what reasons people have for reffing a draw.
I can't decide what people should draw and what they shouldn't.

If I had to say: "I never copied a draw" then that would be a lie.
When I was 10, I redrew Trunks from Dragon Ball Z. I took it everywhere, even to school. During Gym class. Put it in the changing rooms. I was in love with my own creation X'). My first love was my own drawing X'DDD.

ok. enuff.

You can use reference for practice.
But I think that the point of RMD is to show off your skills with your own original work or own original fanart.
^ captures all of my thoughs of ref using ^

And I know not everybody agrees with that, but that's how seriously I take my drawing things on this website >:\

I don't think fanart is a copy(< ref used). I mean, if I copy narutopicture using a copyingmachine, would the copymachine make fanart...?

AND what buhrd said

I'm never returning to this topic again. This is a never ending discussion anyways. There ain't no right and there ain't no wrong.

now to soften up the mood with something funny:
http://gif.mocksession.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/MICHIGAN-STATE-BANDIE.gif

Nine
19 Mar, 2012 10:02 am

People will rate, how they want to rate. Figuring out why seems pointless to me personally, because both the for and against have valid logical reasons and the ones who don't, figuring out why they rate the way they do is will be crazy.

buhrd
19 Mar, 2012 8:49 am

I don't really like when people copy stylized drawings- mostly manga, anime and cartoon stuff- but realism I don't mind for practise every now and then...

I think it's usually more fun and rewarded to draw your own style and works (although I do sometimes like to draw a photo of a person)


As for rating, it doesn't really affect how much I rate... more how likely I am to rate anything.
But then, I don't rate much anyway as I'm not on very often.

mellmonster
19 Mar, 2012 4:41 am

red*rogue wrote:

mellmonster wrote:

red*rogue wrote:

It's often that I don't notice if a ref has been used.
Artist often don't say it.
GIVE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.

I want to see the artist in the drawing. It doesn't feel original if I can't see the artist. Artists have their own unique style as their trademark and that's what I adore about the artists here. I can often recognize drawings and say which artist it belongs to
.

This isn't Deviantart, you know?

People usually don't post a Reference because they don't like it when people compare the original with their version.
Besides that, I don't post references anymore either, because some people accuse me of things, without having any prove. Also, people who do use references, also draw Original's it's not like they only draw Fanart that's bull. (Not implying you said that. Lol)

Eitherway, Fanart is Fanart, we all have to life with it. It's not like it'll disappear after everyone's done complaining about it. hmm
//END SERIOUS REPLY.

In my opinion, giving credit to the original artist is being respectful.

I usually go by the idea that everyone their drawing and stuff is 100% their own.
And sometimes I rate drawings and later figure out they have been copied. Completely copied.
And not mentioned. Mentioning that it has been originally drawn by somebody else is (to me) a sign of respect to the original artist. Even if you don't know who made it. Not mentioning it is like not showing respect to the original artist (to me).

And I just dislike copied drawings. Some people copy because they like it and I think that there are other people who copy because they're afraid their own original art won't be appreciated...

I draw Fanart because there are certain screenshots I love and want to draw, for example, my most rated drawing. I loved drawing that picture, besides that, people are still free to not post references, even if you want them to post it, they won't.

There's really nothing you can do about it, you'll have to deal with it. Rather you like it or not.

Also, there are artists on here that drawing "Original" and are actually using references, which is pretty lower than not posting a reference to a fanart drawing. In my opinion that is.

red*rogue
24 Feb, 2012 2:19 pm

mellmonster wrote:

red*rogue wrote:

It's often that I don't notice if a ref has been used.
Artist often don't say it.
GIVE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.

I want to see the artist in the drawing. It doesn't feel original if I can't see the artist. Artists have their own unique style as their trademark and that's what I adore about the artists here. I can often recognize drawings and say which artist it belongs to
.

This isn't Deviantart, you know?

People usually don't post a Reference because they don't like it when people compare the original with their version.
Besides that, I don't post references anymore either, because some people accuse me of things, without having any prove. Also, people who do use references, also draw Original's it's not like they only draw Fanart that's bull. (Not implying you said that. Lol)

Eitherway, Fanart is Fanart, we all have to life with it. It's not like it'll disappear after everyone's done complaining about it. hmm
//END SERIOUS REPLY.

In my opinion, giving credit to the original artist is being respectful.

I usually go by the idea that everyone their drawing and stuff is 100% their own.
And sometimes I rate drawings and later figure out they have been copied. Completely copied.
And not mentioned. Mentioning that it has been originally drawn by somebody else is (to me) a sign of respect to the original artist. Even if you don't know who made it. Not mentioning it is like not showing respect to the original artist (to me).

And I just dislike copied drawings. Some people copy because they like it and I think that there are other people who copy because they're afraid their own original art won't be appreciated...

Board footer

228 online members & visitors
See who's online
Follow us on:
RateMyDrawings on FacebookRateMyDrawings on YouTube RateMyDrawings on Twitter

Copyright Mixart New Media LLC.
As creators of drawings, you own the rights to your own drawings. Respect copyright protected artwork.
More information in our Terms and Copyright Policy.

About RateMyDrawings Terms & Conditions Advertise on RMD Privacy Policy Donate Behavior Guide